Talk:North Weald railway station

Trains: Stations / in UK / in London Low‑importance

	Trains Portal

	London Transport Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject London Transport (assessed as Low-importance).

This article lacks references.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Underground Limited, cooking the books?[edit]

The comments regarding LUL over staffing Ongar and North Weald sound almost the same as comments I made on another website! However, it IS true they over staffed the stations among other things! A good example of the over staffing is Blake Hall, LUL would have as many as FIVE staff members there, although on average it was THREE for a station which was the size of a toilet and had about four passengers a day!!!

I could tell a lot more but won't as even though the information is 20 plus years old, only a very few people know it, and it could cause problems for people still working in LUL.(Spymo (talk) 23:32, 16 May 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Closed - Former[edit]

I've changed the "closed" to "former" to imply that while the station is no longer on the underground it is in some sense still there (whether the new people run trains or not). Does this work for you? Britmax (talk) 07:47, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]