Talk:Package-deal fallacy

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic

Package Deals In Contracts[edit]

I removed this passage:

Use of this fallacy is also common in contract negotiation, where it is called iunctim or tying.

Because package deals in contract negotiations are not a logical fallacy in the strictest sense, are not always against the law nor generally frowned upon by the business community. Dhvrm 23:30, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

this article is trying to explain the fallacy of division —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.15.29.209 (talk) 15:24, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article mistakes inference for a fallacy[edit]

If it's true that a candidate is a conservative, then one can reasonably infer that he will oppose gun control and abortion. A fallacy would be "My opponent voted against against higher taxes and welfare, so it follows that he will oppose gun control and abortion".

Really, almost any example would be better than this one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.248.226.133 (talk) 04:37, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]