Talk:Personal health record
|WikiProject Medicine||(Rated B-class, Low-importance)|
The article, as it stands, seems to ignore the types of PHRs that are integrated with EHRs. For instance, a hospital that uses an Epic EHR system might also install MyChart for patients. So-called patient portals like MyChart give patients a view of their personal health information stored in the EHR. Many consider these patient portals to also be PHRs, though this is debatable. Should we add this type?
I also wonder if we shouldn't change the first sentence of the article. PHRs aren't always 'created' by the patient. If we include patient portals as PHRs, then it's obvious that some PHRs are 'created' by an entity other than the patient. Even if we exclude patient portals, some PHRs allow importation of data from other systems. Thus, saying that the patient 'creates' the PHR isn't entirely accurate.
Vitamin D 15:45, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Someone has twice advertised "Global Lifeguard" as a "good example" of a PHR on this page. Twice I've removed it. Is someone being naughty or can you make an argument why that is a valid change to the page?
Vitamin D 17:43, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
I apparently did something wrong. I added a section on PHR products with a link to MyPHR.com. I also added a reference to my product (Not the Global Lifeguard). When I have researched other topics on Wikipedia I have found it useful to know what products implement or provide such services. Even just a name would be useful. As a consumer I would think at least a link to myPHR.com would be beneficial. Many people searching for a personal health record don't just want to know what it is but where they can find one. The section I added was removed.
Pauldaly 16:46, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Never mind. I see the External link reference. I do disagree about the directory comment though. I use Wikipedia often and find many products and services where I can not find them easily elsewhere on the Internet. Thank you for leaving the MyPHR link available though.
Cheers Pauldaly 16:50, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Too many references
I think there are too many journal articles/etc. Anyone knowledgeable care to pare it down to the essential literature on the subject? We don't need to cite every paper ever written about PHRs. --Karl.brown (talk) 16:51, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
"Privacy and Ethical Concerns" section
I edited this section in an attempt to make it more neutral. I also marked some places that need citations. In general, this section needs significantly more citations, and should be checked by someone more knowledgeable on this subject to make sure that there isn't any original research. TheNewKarl (talk) 09:41, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
"Government eHealth PHR" section
The article provides a good overview of Personal Health Records. I would be interested to know if you would consider including the personally controlled electronic health record system managed by the Australian Government - eHealth. The eHealth record system came into effect on the 1st July 2012 and allows individuals to control their eHealth record whilst having the security of Government backing. Cheers J C A Mackie (talk) 09:34, 24 March 2013 (UTC) 09:30, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
|This article is the subject of an educational assignment at La Trobe University supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2013 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.|
Review for Health Informatics C
- Provided detailed information on various topics
- Effectively defined the definition of PHR and its origin
- Well organised structure that logically flows
- Could include the disadvantages regarding the use of PHR
- Could further expand the topic 'PHR and public health'