Talk:Polka Party!/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 22:51, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be glad to take this one--listened to this album far too many times as a kid. Comments to follow in the next 1-3 days. Thanks as always for your contributions! -- Khazar2 (talk) 22:51, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

James Cox is a DAB page; none of these seem to be the right guy. -- Khazar2 (talk) 22:53, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I just removed the link, since, as you pointed out, it doesn't look like he has an article.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 04:39, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"purchased full ads" -- do you mean "full-page ads"?
Yeah, that's what I meant. Whoops!
Sonny Burke's article states that he died 1980; this album came out 1986. Different Sonny Burke?
I think it must be. Otherwise there was some time travel involved here.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 02:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Checklist[edit]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	~~See minor clarity points above.~~ Spotchecks show no copyright issues.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	Another good article! Thanks for your speedy responses.