Talk:Psychic reading

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Parapsychology, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ParapsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject ParapsychologyTemplate:WikiProject ParapsychologyParapsychology articles

Paranormal

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism Start‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 May 2020 and 6 July 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Frank0229.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:24, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

I think this page has been badly graffitied - Anyone who wants to make edits should discuss them and not write in big letters EDIT all over the page. I will be deleting this graffiti and the person(s) can discuss their changes properly! - KidinUK 20:58, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I obviously reverted to the wrong version. Sorry. ——Martin^phi_{(Talk Ψ Contribs)} 22:54, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tags placed February 2010 (multiple issues)[edit]

There is no discussion here regarding the current tags placed two months ago. I agree with these tags, but can only state as such in a general way because of this lack of discussion. I am willing to make a go with this article. However, I am a somewhat apprehensive as my first attempt to do so in February was reverted with an improper explanation in that revert's comment field. I recognize there is a need for rational skepticism policing on paranormal-related articles that are frequented with New Age SPAM, but simple reverts are weighty and frustrating when considerably more time goes into edits that have content with neutral literary care.

That having been said. My first intended focus will be references as they are considered the cornerstone of credibility in an encyclopedia. - Steve3849 12:44, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to say I'm done working on this article. Anyone willing to discuss the removal of the tags, or what the article needs still? - Steve3849 21:23, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

information cited for (2) is going to spam affiliate page.[edit]

I'm unsure how to edit or what to do? Seems to have a lot of spam links —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.185.241.175 (talk) 13:21, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just looked at (2) and see it is a cached article from the The Boston Globe. I looked at the condition of the page during the date of this post (March 16) and am assuming the concern was for a SPAM external link which has since been removed. - Steve3849 ^talk 04:07, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm now working on this page[edit]

I'm now working on this page offline, feel free to add suggestions under this comment and I'll add them in if they're of quality.

Daniel Skitt (talk) 13:46, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2015 Update planned[edit]

As I am working on an update for Richard Wiseman and his 2011 book Paranormality: Why we see what isn’t there, I heard a quote that might be good to include as a confirmation of the pseudoscience comments already on the page. I hope to get that update on in a few days.Kjbavaro (talk) 21:03, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]