Talk:Radha Vallabha Sampradaya

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Krishnaism (assessed as High-importance).

India: Uttar Pradesh Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Uttar Pradesh (assessed as Low-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Vaishnavism#Four sampradayas and ither traditions|four major Vaishnavite sampradayas]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Expert review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The result was: Probably notable - will remove the notability tag --B. Wolterding (talk) 11:30, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please leave your comments below. Thanks, --B. Wolterding (talk) 13:01, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The sect exists, albeit as a small one. It is related to, though not necessarily part of, Gaudiya Vaishnavism. --Shruti14 ^{t c s} 01:26, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, then I think it's probably notable - but the article needs sources for clarification. --B. Wolterding (talk) 11:29, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.