Talk:Rockland, Ontario

Canada: Ontario / Communities Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian communities.

Prescott-Russell (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Prescott-Russell, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Prescott-RussellWikipedia:WikiProject Prescott-RussellTemplate:WikiProject Prescott-RussellPrescott-Russell articles

Rockland is a town

Rockland is a town. Just because it is part of the City of Clarence-Rockland doesn't mean it is just a community. There is more to places than the incorporated ones.

In fact, unincorporated communities are more important than their respective municipalities because a municipality can't exist without a community, but a community can exist without a municipality.

If someone from Toronto was to ask someone from Rockland where they are from, the person from Rockland wouldn't say, "I'm from Clarence-Rockland" (the name of the municipality) they would say "I'm from Rockland" (the name of the community). --216.106.103.82 16:06, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, this statement should be corrected, and wikilinked. if it is an unicorporated community, it needs to be clarified. what is it? FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:02, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Plagued by alcoholism and suicide?

That definitely needs corroboration ... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sigma57b (talk • contribs) 02:49, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A dry community?

This is not correct —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.103.249.251 (talk) 17:50, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Also, the source provided is from Statscan and shows a population growth of more than 7% between 2001 to 2006 and states nothing regarding 2009. — Dorvaq (talk) 22:28, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]