Talk:Rospuda

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

2006

photo and infobox added, reqphoto templete del SWojczyszyn 13:29, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I believe better name would be Rospuda River per River WikiProject guidelines & Naming conventions. Renata 18:30, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

True. Moved, double redirect dealt with. --SWojczyszyn 19:17, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The average discharge seems a bit low te me —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.204.201.181 (talk) 14:06, 2 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Could be. I found 2.57 m³/s at a travel website. Sound more likely? Deuar 15:49, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Prosiłbym o więcej obiekywizmu i przedstawienie strony rządowej jak i mieszkańców Augustowa!

Anyone wishing to write about the Via Baltica conflict in an objective manner is welcome to do so. SWojczyszyn (talk) 21:38, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]