Talk:Ross's goose

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Ross's Goose)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 January 2019 and 8 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rds.csus.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ross Goose Photo[edit]

Current picture (Anser rossii -California, USA-8a.jpg) is of a juvenile Ross goose (note: the grey feathers near its eye and at the back of its neck, as well as lack of caruncles at the base of its bill). I've changed the caption of the picture to reflect this, but at some point a picture of an adult would be needed for this article. Luzingit (talk) 20:48, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Updated with photo of adult Rds.csus (talk) 21:03, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Fulvous Whistling Duck which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 13:30, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article Evaluation[edit]

This page should be expanded to include information on habitat, behavior, diet and feeding, relationship with humans, etc. Reference 2 to "Queen Maud Gulf" is a dead link. Rds.csus (talk) 00:11, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Currently working on filling out each section and adding better photos for ID Rds.csus (talk) 17:13, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your article is neatly organized and contains all the basic specifications for someone who has not yet learned about this bird species. Behavior section is straight to the point and gets the information across about how these birds interact with their environment. I enjoyed reading this article because it contained all the information needed to understand this species, and the condensed format is easy for the reader to read all the way through. Overall, really great article, did not see any grammatical errors throughout the reading. Great Job! --Miegodorales (talk) 00:57, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]