Talk:Sarawak Corridor of Renewable Energy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Renewable Energy[edit]

Unfortunately I find that the article fails to mention how the project plans to meet its renewable energy claims. There is some mention of what appears to be resources exploitation and mining, but I fail to see how this could be considered sustainable, the way it is presented. If on the other hand the name of the project is considered to mislead, there also lacks some criticism on this aspect. 76.10.128.192 (talk) 03:34, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I now see hydroelectric dams in the template box at the bottom. This is already a good start. It would still be nice if the article had a little more information about these projects. PaleoNeonate (talk) 11:58, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sarawak Corridor of Renewable Energy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:52, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]