Talk:Selk'nam people

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Selknam people)

Down hunted[edit]

A down hunted ona? Wouldn't "dead" or "killed" or "murdered" be more accurate? I mean, we're not talking about wild game here. 74.78.98.109 (talk) 08:41, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know it sounds inhuman under current moral standards (and perhaps even by then), but there was indeed such a thing as "human hunts" in the past against people living in the wild. Cambalachero (talk) 15:11, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Contradiction[edit]

The infobox says there are 505 Selknam, yet the article says they're extinct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.211.34.225 (talk) 06:22, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

According to 2001's argentinian census 505 people identify as selk'nam and there's a bigger number of people (over 1000) that claims to posses some degree of selk'nam blood. Tomás Vicente (talk) 04:10, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

According to the Argentinian census of 2010, there are 2761 Selk'nam now. Tomás Vicente (talk) 02:07, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keyuk Yanten[edit]

He Is not the last selk'nam nor a linguistic prodigy, over a thousand people claim selk'nam ancestry in Argentina and he Is criticized by indigenous communities in facebook and a chilean anthropologist for being a fraud and a liar who pretended to speak several indigenous languages but refused to speak when confronted by other speakers such as the Kaweskar and the Tehuelche community. Tomás Vicente (talk) 04:13, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

. Tomás Vicente (talk) 15:02, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chile's Flag[edit]

If the census comes from Argentina, which is demonstrated by the ending ".ar" in the link's page. Why is the Chilean flag the icon instead of the Argentinian one? Besides, Chile doesn't recognize the Selk'nam because nobody has successfully proved Selk'nam ancestors, while Argentina does. Tomás Vicente (talk) 01:27, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

¿Why does the administration ask me to use the talk page if nobody else is even going to try and use it as well? They would rather let a mistake go unchecked than actually check the sources themselves and realize who is on the wrong side.... Tomás Vicente (talk) 23:02, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Selk'nam people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:05, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting removal of picture described below.[edit]

Please remove following picture described as: Public Domain File:Popper en caceria.jpg Created: 1 January 1886 Unknown author - Photo album donated to then-president Miguel Juárez Celman. The picture is available at The Museum of World Cutlure (Världskulturmuseet) as no 008218. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.95.231.156 (talk) 09:21, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Flag?[edit]

What is the validity of this flag, exactly? What is it based on? I'm not sure it is an authentic flag used by the Selk'nam people themselves, but a "fanmade" flag made by a passionate of flags with no official capacity or recognition by Selk'nam peoples. Might be wrong. 166.62.226.9 (talk) 21:26, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]