Talk:Separation of powers in Singapore

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dubious[edit]

This reads like a Singaporean high school civics class textbook. Somewhere close to none of it is true. Singapore is a one-party machine government in which the opposition plays no role, the President plays no meaningful role, the various councils and committees have very little power, and the judiciary has only the very tiniest independence and even that never over a political matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:6A:6905:5C00:219:E3FF:FE07:AF53 (talk) 23:58, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We've tried our best to ensure all the information in the article is referenced. If there is additional information you wish to add and you have reliable third-party references for it, please feel free to help improve the article. — SMUconlaw (talk) 07:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV[edit]

No... I don't have time to engage in this sort of crap. I have a job. Smuconlaw, this article is *your* crap. The NPOV label remains up until there is significant external support to remove it. I will undo any effort by Smuconlaw or anyone who appears to me to be a Singaporean national to remove the NPOV label. This article is garbage and you know that.

For anyone visiting, the history contains my revision. This article is too long, and too full of falsehoods, to treat nicely. How Singapore is really run is not a secret, and its government must not be permitted to pretend otherwise on Wikipedia. This article is using Wikipedia as a vector for propaganda. Its length intimidates editors who may not have the time to fix it. This article is an excellent example of why Wikipedia should not exist at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:6A:6955:2E00:219:E3FF:FE07:AF53 (talk) 11:43, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of "3P" tag[edit]

@Pacerier: Could you please point out which "sources too closely associated with the subject" have been excessively relied upon? It's not clear to me why this tag applies to the article. — SMUconlaw (talk) 09:48, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's been more than a week, and you haven't responded, so I have removed the tag for the time being. — SMUconlaw (talk) 08:38, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Separation of powers in Singapore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:39, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Separation_of_powers_in_Singapore&oldid=1205249529"