Talk:Shōshinkai

Japan: Religion Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 04:34, May 7, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Religion task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Buddhism Stub‑class Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Any article[edit]

that use a text called, "Guide to refuting [erroneous teachings of] other schools" as its only source cannot in any way be considered objective. This is clearly a statement of the Nichiren Shoshu version of events, not a balanced approach.

Please don't assume so much on so little evidence. The article, which I wrote for the most part, is largely based on the Japanese Wikipedia article as it stood when I authored the article. I used the book you criticize, which is admittedly biased, to fill in a lot of the blanks. I also accept that some of the content may constitute original research in that I am personally acquainted with some of the participants in the dispute on the Nichiren Shoshu side. I have made no effort to hide this.

That said, please note that I do dispute any accusations of intent to provide a biased or unbalanced accounting, since it is my personal belief that such presentations are inherently as unstable as they are untenable, not to mention more damaging to the party to which they are biased. If you can substantiate the factual inaccuracy of anything in the article, please change it while providing your sources. Unfortunately, very little information is available on the matter in English, neccessitating that we turn to Japanese sources for primary information. Best regards, Jim_Lockhart 22:50, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Shōshinkai. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080628042446/http://www.fujimon.or.jp/ to http://www.fujimon.or.jp/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:49, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]