Talk:Shahid-e-Bharat

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of orders, decorations, and medals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Orders, decorations, and medalsWikipedia:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsTemplate:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsOrders, decorations, and medals articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

India High‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / Indian / South Asia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Indian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

Self Contradiction[edit]

The article states, as on June 30th, 2010, that the medal in question "was only awarded with swords". However, it also states "'The award could be conferred with swords for valour in combat, and without swords for non-combat awards.'"

These statements, as evident, are self contradictory. I will try to find out the correct information. However, it seems that somebody has copied the text from a similar article pertaining to another medal awarded by the same authorities; and has neglected to remove the statement. SanskritGuy (talk) 11:35, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you can find the correct information, please Be bold and add it. 88.108.101.67 (talk) 12:26, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]