Talk:Southern California Bight

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This entry doesn't make sense.[edit]

A bight is an oceanographic feature. There are no human inhabitants of a bight. This entry seems to be about Southern California indigenous cultures, not about the bight. These cultures certainly used and depended on the resources of the bight, but it shouldn't be the sole emphasis of the entry.

207.172.129.17 13:14, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


AGREE COMPLETELY.

Someone took it upon themselves to load on a whole lot of Indian history here. I can only imagine why (though I have my suspicions).

Furthermore, a link that actually IS topic-related was somehow booted in an earlier edit. (A satellite image of the bight courtesy CSULB.)

http://seis.natsci.csulb.edu/bperry/scbweb/homepage.htm

Keep on point, folks. Please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.228.85.209 (talk) 17:14, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is a very strange article. It should be deleted until someone writes an article about this bight. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.35.223.254 (talk) 18:10, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Southern California Bight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:19, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]