Talk:Stanley Steemer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Stanleysteemerlogo.jpg[edit]

Image:Stanleysteemerlogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 20:37, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Connection to Stanley automobile?[edit]

I was under the impression that the carpet cleaners were actually the last vestige of the stanley co, which made cars called (officially and unofficially), Stanley Steamers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.235.56.24 (talk) 06:53, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is no connection between the two companies other than the coincidentally similar name. Night Ranger (talk) 18:46, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm told they did make a legal agreement with the Stanley family for use of the name back when they were a small local company. I wonder if I can find published mention of that. Not R (talk) 14:11, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]