Talk:Tarawa-class amphibious assault ship

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Landing Craft Utility#LCU 1610, 1627 and 1646 classes|LCU 1610]] The anchor (#LCU 1610, 1627 and 1646 classes) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Names[edit]

None of the five listed ships are named after American Revolutionary War battles. Were any of the other unbuilt ships planned to be named as such? --Kevin W. 04:39, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Nassau?

Aircraft carriers[edit]

Can the class be considered technically "aircraft carriers"? The former Soviet Kiev class carried VSTOL sircraft and helicopters and were considered aircraft carriers. best 194.80.106.135 (talk) 10:37, 2 June 2008 (UTC) Perhaps, Harrier (AV-8) have operated from these vessels. By size this is larger that vessels some other nations consider aircraft carriers. However, these vessels also have their well deck to operate LCACs and other craft. I sill speculate that the magazines to handle aviation ordnance - and allow safe handling and transport to the flight deck is limited and below what would be expected for an aircraft carrier. The class lacks a Ski jump, or catapults or arresting gear/wires frequently found with aircraft carriers. These ships operated OV-10 Bronco's with out that though some early in their career. Wfoj2 (talk) 01:55, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Boilers[edit]

Are the boilers on these ships the largest boiler ever aboard a ship ?Wfoj2 (talk) 01:57, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Verb tense: present or past?[edit]

Since all ships of the class have been decommissioned as of 2015 (stated in the article itself), shouldn't all verb tenses be changed from present to past? --Seth Knops (talk • contribs) 15:12, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Three of the ships are still in the Reserve Fleet and two of those are on donation hold. FYI - wolf 22:19, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]