Talk:TaskJuggler

This article was nominated for deletion on 2006 July 23. The result of the discussion was delete.

This article was nominated for deletion on 2006 October 5. The result of the discussion was keep.

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

FWIW, I'm strongly inclined toward keep. Obviously a lot of work has gone into this over a several year period. There is a moderately active forum as these things go, apparently using the project rather quietly to manage real-world projects, and a reasonable cycle of maintenance releases. I think the main problem with lack of notability is that PM software is very dull to write about. If you search the Fedora core package list for GANTT it's one of two results returned. I used it and it mostly worked as described. I think in cases like this the standard for notability needs to tempered with a sense of public utility. In no way is the project proprietary, underground, half-baked, or marginal in its application to real world concerns. That ought to be enough. How many other articles here can make all the same claims? MaxEnt 00:18, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Major rework[edit]

My effort to make this sound more encyclopedic amounted to placing TJ more precisely within the taxonomy of computer science, with more focus on conceptual approach rather than the feature set supported. It's far from perfect, and probably as much as (or a bit more than) I'm qualified to write based on my limited exposure. MaxEnt 23:50, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

After version 3 is the link to KDE still strong?[edit]

Text and categories of the article emphasize strong link to KDE. Is that still true after the rewrite to Ruby and dropping the GUI? --86.2.33.101 (talk) 08:41, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TJ 2... Blown away as it never existed...[edit]

Hello! I am assessing project management software tools and bumped into TJ. But the version 2 has been literally wiped away from the official site (as it were some hated pharaoh!!!):

https://rubygems.org/gems/taskjuggler/versions

For example, https://github.com/taskjuggler/TaskJuggler/issues/20, reads that someone was unable to find even documentation. Usually it is kept even after a software product is retired.

Can anyone bring some explanation about this issue? Patent or copyright issues? Does is have to do with the GUI? (Only CLI versions remain.)

Thank you! George Rodney Maruri Game (talk) 20:59, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]