Talk:The Dirty Picture/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Vensatry (talk · contribs) 15:56, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this article. Will start the process shortly. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 15:56, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Prose

Needs a small copy edit. You may request at the guild.
"In UAE, on Thursday alone, the film made 3.2 lakh Dirhams". Give the INR and dollar equivalent of "Dirhams"
One line paras like this must be avoided.

The film was banned on Pakistan owing to certain bold scenes, however was later release post a week on 10 December 2011.

Hyphens must be converted to either em dashes or en dashes.
WP:OVERLINKING

This is the major problem with the prose part. The names of "Vidya Balan", "Milan Luthria", "Emraan Hashmi", etc., are linked heavily in "Development", "Casting" and "Promotions" sections. Same for the box-office section. Also check for other words.

References

There are a lot of problems with the formatting of references:

Printed media should be italicized.Remove ('') from the "publisher" parameters, cause sdding that will remove italics.
The publisher for "Hindustan Times" is "HT Media Ltd"
Reference #73 doesn't work. Try finding an archive using the Way Back Machine or replace it with another good source.
As per MOS:DATEUNIFY, date format in citations needs to be maintained consistently.
Ref #65, #66 use bare URLs
There are mismatches in the use of "cite news" and "cite web" templates. For eg., you use "cite news" for "bollywoodhungama" and "cite web" template for "Times of India" and "starboxoffice.com" is not a news source.
Check the "work" parameter of ref #43
"bollywoodlife.com", "gomolo" and "BollySpice" doesn't seem reliable for me.
You have linked "bollywoodhungama" in all your ref except ref #36. Either link all or just the first alone.
Use First name & Last name for authors. None of your ref follow that.
Most of the references are incomplete. Fill all the missing parameters wherever required.

The article looks good except for the ref formatting. Try fixing all these issues with in the seven-day period. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 09:35, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm failing this article. It's been a week now since I started the review and none of the issues have been resolved so far. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 03:21, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have made the necessary changes. Sorry for the delay. smaro! 05:17, 4 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smarojit (talk • contribs)

Lions Gold awards and BIG star awards need sources. X.One ^SOS 08:55, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the format of the table, but still it seems like I removed some info. Please let me know if I indeed did. X.One ^SOS 08:58, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]