Talk:The Family Guy 100th Episode Special

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

	Television portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This redirect lacks sufficient references and adequate inline citations. Please provide any citations per verifiability and reliable sources.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this redirect.

Animation: Television / Family Guy Low‑importance

	Animation portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by the Animated television work group.
	This redirect is supported by the Family Guy work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This redirect lacks sufficient references and adequate inline citations. Once the references are added, please remove the `\|unref=` parameter from this template.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this redirect.

New look[edit]

dose it look better.--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 19:26, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Should this episode get a mention in Family_Guy_(season_6)? John a s (talk) 23:39, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 What's up with it? It repeats the same irrelevant information over and over. Some should edit it so that it makes more sense.

Agree whole heartedly; have cut out some of the obvious advertising bumf.Trinkella (talk) 22:52, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]