Talk:King's School, Chester

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

Schools High‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cheshire Mid‑importance

	Cheshire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cheshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cheshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CheshireWikipedia:WikiProject CheshireTemplate:WikiProject CheshireCheshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Partial Protection

I've partially protected this article for 3 months to stop the continuous addition of material that is not up to wikipedia's standards by mostly anonymous editors. The last that I saw was some material that seemed to blatantly break WP:BLP guidelines. Now, if any such material is added, we can at least see who it is who is adding it, because the last addition seemed very much to be done by an experienced editor hiding behind an anonymous IP address. DDStretch (talk) 12:10, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to me that a lot of sections in the article aren't up to Wikipedia standards, not just the "Controversies" section. It's not against the rules to post anonymously, and you don't know for sure why anonymous posters choose to remain anonymous. It seems that some people are intent on removing embarrassing facts from the page. If a teacher goes to jail for downloading child pornography, it seems to me that this is an important fact that needs to be included on the page. If you want to removing sub-standard material, just remove the sub-standard material, not the entire section. It's a fact that a teacher went to jail, and I daresay it's more important, relevant, and interesting than the fact that the school's pupils take part in 130 extra-curricular activities, or that an ex-headmaster starred in a school play more than 10 years ago. Alice already in wonderland (talk) 11:18, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 25 July 2013

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The King's School Chester moved to its present site in 1960, not 1950. I know - Iwas apupil there at the time of the move. Paul Cartwright

86.174.66.101 (talk) 09:50, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is useful, but it cannot be added unless it can be verified by a Reliable Source. If you strongly feel that it should be added, see if you can find some reliable source that gives the same information, and come back to us. I hope that helps. DDStretch (talk) 21:03, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The date of 1950 is (presumably) not from a verifiable source anyway, so why keep the wrong date if you know it's wrong? It's pedantry gone mad! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.74.225.132 (talk) 20:43, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know which date is right or wrong. It seems a good idea to do nothing unless some reliable source is found. You may call it pedantry. I and wikipedia would call it being prudent and not opening oneself up to "surrogate vandalism" because this kind of thing has happened before. Instead of moaning about pedantry, you could be using the time to try to find some reliable sources. DDStretch (talk) 03:58, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on King's School, Chester. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.kingschester.co.uk/news/456/183/King-s-hockey-coach-wins-European-Indoor-Gold-Medal-with-national-team

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:54, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on King's School, Chester. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:45, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Five years of being patient- time to act

Many of the alleged reference point back to a broschure published by the schools PR department. The school is a product- and there is no room on Wikipedia for product placement. To stimulate the development of the article I am deleting a lot of material that is otherwise unreferenced. --ClemRutter (talk) 23:37, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]