Talk:The Mermaid (1910 film)

The Mermaid (1910 film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: February 12, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Film: Silent / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Silent films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Società Anonima Ambrosio film[edit]

The Società Anonima Ambrosio film is very obscure at this point in time, but it seems to be a drama instead of a comedy. Since there is little information about this film, I did not include a red link to the other film of the same title. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 22:23, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Mermaid (1910 film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: DepressedPer (talk · contribs) 20:31, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thought I lend a hand in reviewing the short films you put up for nomination.

Found some minor issues in this article:

The lead credits the film as a 'comedy' but the categories say its a 'drama'.
"The Moving Picture World review found the film to be an effective production, but spared few details and a short summary of the film." Remove the word review from this section.
Unlink The Moving Picture World in the Release and reception section.
Link the publishers in the sources if possible.
Some of the sources' accessdates should be formatted to mdy.

Just like the rest of your work on these articles, Its structured very well, information is well sourced and the references are put in spots that are necessary. I'll put this on hold for the issues to be fixed. DepressedPer (talk) 22:54, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@DepressedPer: - All set, good catch on the categories. I didn't flip those over. This is one of the few films of the era that I do not have a still for, but I hope that one might be in the Silent Film Collection. I've found a few un-titled ones and have attributed those for the collection, but many more may exist. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 06:13, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Got through the issues like a breeze. Good job, it's now a GA. DepressedPer (talk) 07:11, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.