Talk:Tine (structural)

Comment[edit]

This term is relevant to the theory behind how electric pianos work. It needs to be expanded. Zyxoas (talk to me - I'll listen) 18:04, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2007-02-9 Automated pywikipediabot message[edit]

This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.
The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.)
Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.
Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.

--CopyToWiktionaryBot 11:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Until Wik-tionary actually catches on, I think leaving more obscure words in Wikipedia is more convenient and accessible for the individuals looking for them. I think it would hurt both Wikipedia and Wik-tionary by removing words like this before people catch on, because they are more likely to simply do away with them, rather than actually hunt for what they are looking for. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.48.51.154 (talk) 17:11, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

wiktionary[edit]

Personally found the version by ArnoldReinhold more useful than the wiktionary entry. Room for both I think. The article should not focus only physical descriptions however, but on functionality also. I was led here due to the term's usage in botany. Some persons like to think of objects in terms of dictionary entries, I believe, and others in terms of encyclopedia articles. May be somewhat restrictive to limit this structure to dictionaries. JMK (talk) 11:54, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]