Talk:Togo women's national football team/GA2
GA Reassessment[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Over the coming days, I will be reassessing this article to determine whether it still meets the Good Article criteria. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 05:08, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
| Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Well-written: | ||
|
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Some issues, those are detailed below. |
|
|
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Numerous issues. Team rosters need missing information added, Individual records have two empty and orange-tagged lists, honours section is empty, managers section is unsourced, the first all-time records section has no citations or a color key, the second all-time record section which is named identically to the first one has two empty lists, etc. See also section doesn't need "Women's football in Togo" if there's no link there. |
| 2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
|
|
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Refs 14 and 15 are formatted incorrectly, Ref 17 is a bare URL. A couple other inconsistencies (Ref 8 and 9, for example) |
|
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Happy to go through these individually once other issues are taken care of. |
|
|
2c. it contains no original research. | Managers list and Achievements section are unsourced. |
|
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | |
| 3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
|
|
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | Only one line of unsourced prose about the "Team image", which just gives the name of the home stadium. No background info or anything like that is given. |
|
|
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | |
|
|
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
|
|
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | |
| 6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
|
|
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Team logo is fair use. |
|
|
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Team logo is relevant. |
|
7. Overall assessment. | |
Issues with criterion 1a[edit]
Lead/infobox[edit]
- Article has been orange-tagged for an update since September 2020
- No need to include "unknown" in the infobox, just take those fields out
- The lead first paragraph says "The team has played five FIFA-recognised matches" but the second paragraph says "Currently, they are unranked on the FIFA Women's World Rankings for not having played more than five matches against officially ranked teams", this seems contradictory to me. Also their FIFA ranking is listed as 115 in the infobox so this second paragraph of the lead seems inaccurate.
History[edit]
- In the second paragraph, is there any explanation as to why they withdrew?
- Third paragraph, "The performance of the new team, however, wasn't good as expected" → how good were they expected to be?
- Third paragraph is entirely unsourced.
Overall review conclusion[edit]
WP:GAR states that An individual assessment may be closed after seven days of no activity.
As there have been no improvements made on the article and the reassessment has been open for nine days, I am closing the review. My conclusion is that the article fails GA criteria 1a, 1b, 2a, 2c, and 3a, at least, and therefore will be 
delisted. If improvements are made in the future, and the article is brought up to par, it can be renominated for GA. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:15, 13 May 2022 (UTC)