Talk:Trident (McCoy Tyner album)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Jazz

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Rename proposal[edit]

I propose renaming this article, from "Trident (album)" to "Trident (McCoy Tyner album)". Recently I created an article called "Trident (Kingfish album)", and added a hatnote (disambiguation link) to the top of this article. But, I think it would be better if "Trident (album)" was a disambiguation page, with links to the two album articles, "Trident (McCoy Tyner album)" and "Trident (Kingfish album)". Per Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Is there a primary topic?, this should be done, unless one of the two albums is "a well-known primary topic for an ambiguous term, name or phrase, much more used than any other topic covered in Wikipedia to which the same word(s) may also refer". However I don't think that's the case here. It would be different if the Kingfish album was called, say, Kind of Blue, or Giant Steps. I'm going to wait a while before doing the rename and creating the new disambiguation page, to allow time for other editors to give their opinions. Thanks. — Mudwater^(Talk) 13:41, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I support the renaming and creation of a diambiguation page DISEman (talk) 01:10, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'm going to go ahead and rename the article, and create the new disambiguation page. — Mudwater^(Talk) 21:20, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We're all set. Thanks. — Mudwater^(Talk) 21:43, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]