This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The MUD controversy stuff must be cited. If there is no way to verify these claims (whichever POV), the whole subject must be removed. I understand that there may, in fact, be some sort of controversy. However, if you'll read the policy, the standard is verifiability, not fact. If you can't cite a reliable third-party source (e.g. newspaper), it must be removed. This goes for the opposite POV as well. If no source is available, it must be removed. (Nuggetboy) (talk) (contribs) 17:11, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
I corrected this as well. The star-telegram article says ""Further, the NISD has agreed to remove any and all references to this issue from Kyler's file to be destroyed in accordance with the District's records retention schedule. Finally, the District sincerely apologizes for this situation and is hopeful that we can move forward together in the best interests of Kyler," Parker wrote"
The incident will not be part of his permanent record, and I removed that section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 15:52, 18 September 2010 (UTC)