Talk:Knez Mihailova Street

Serbia: Belgrade High‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Belgrade task force (marked as High-importance).

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cultural Heritage of Serbia (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cultural Heritage of Serbia, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Cultural Heritage of SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject Cultural Heritage of SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject Cultural Heritage of SerbiaCultural Heritage of Serbia articles

Culture Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CultureWikipedia:WikiProject CultureTemplate:WikiProject Cultureculture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Serbian spelling

The proper Serbian spelling would be: Ulica knez Mihailova (small k) or Knez Mihailova ulica (small u). --89.216.37.81 18:59, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this is true, current name of the article is grammatically incorrect. Dzigor 19:27, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Name

Personally, I don't like "Knez Mihailova Street", but The Beograd.rs official site uses it. I would like it to be simply "Knez Mihailova" (Кнез Михаилова), as Primary topic. French and Italian articles use native names (parks, streets etc). For instance, the street is predominantly written as "Кнез Михаилова 1" and scarcely as "Кнез Михаилова улица 1"/"Кнез Михаилова ул. 1". Here are the Gbooks hits for different spellings/variations:

"Knez Mihajlova" (205 hits)
"Knez Mihailova" (198)

"Knez Mihailova Street" (42)
"Knez Mihajlova Street" (49)

"Prince Mihailo's Street" (4)
"Knez Mihailo's Street" (3)
"Prince Mihajlo's Street" (2)

"Prince Mihailo Street" (16)
"Prince Mihajlo Street" (4)
"Knez Mihailo Street" (6)
"Knez Mihajlo Street" (2)

In Serbian latin (ulica/ul.):

"Knez Mihailova ulica" (32)
"Knez Mihajlova ulica" (21)

"Ulica Kneza Mihajla" (11)
"Ulica Kneza Mihaila" (9)
"Ul. Kneza Mihajla" (6)
"Ul. Kneza Mihaila" (5)

Listing these in case of future discussions.--Zoupan 21:01, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Knez Mihailova Street. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:27, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]