Talk:Virginia Glee Club

Virginia: University of Virginia Low‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject University of Virginia (assessed as Low-importance).

Permanent To Do List[edit]

List of directors (bios as appropriate)
Post 1915 history
Commissions (Broening)
~~Infobox~~
Current picture
Section on the music itself. The lead section mentions the TTBB arrangement, and this should be discussed and expanded in a section discussing the club's musical style or traditions.
Something to substantiate the lead's claim that the club is critically acclaimed should also be added, either in the section on the music or in a critical reception section.
Expand lead per WP:LEAD

Tjarrett (talk) 13:20, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comments[edit]

Assessment comments added.--Kubigula (talk) 02:57, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Virginia Glee Club/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

==March 23, 2008==

Overall, I would describe this as a nicely developed solid B-class article. In particular, I am impressed with the quality of the referencing.

From a presentation perspective, the article should have an infobox - perhaps {{Infobox musical artist}}? A more current picture would certainly be a plus, and this would allow moving the current image to the history section where it would fit perfectly. However, there are always challenges in getting appropriate and free images, so this may be a longer term project.

In terms of content, what is in the article is great. The prose is good, and the referencing is excellent. I would say the main need would be a section on the music itself. The lead section mentions the TTBB arrangement, and this should be discussed and expanded in a section discussing the club's musical style or traditions. Something to substantiate the lead's claim that the club is critically acclaimed should also be added, either in the section on the music or in a critical reception section. Finally, the lead could use a little more expansion, per WP:LEAD.

Good work!--Kubigula (talk) 02:56, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 02:56, 24 March 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 10:02, 30 April 2016 (UTC)