Talk:Washington Park (baseball)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Baseball / Old-time Base Ball / Dodgers (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Old-time Base Ball task force (marked as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Los Angeles Dodgers (marked as Mid-importance).
 

Gowanus House[edit]

Is the "Gowanus House" mentioned in the article the same as the Old Stone House (Brooklyn)?

Yes. Baseball Bugs 21:10, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:15, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Washington ParkWashington Park (baseball) — Based on the article traffic tool, Washington Park (disambiguation) should be at Washington Park. —TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 15:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
  • Support based on tool above.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 15:12, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Modify There are at least 3 different cities that have had professional baseball parks named "Washington Park", so "Washington Park (baseball)" would be a disambiguation page itself. Better it should be like Recreation Park, where each city name is parenthesized. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 15:25, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Support based on the above and just the fact that there are many Washington Park-related pages on wikipedia. Vertigo700 (talk) 16:45, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Support -- the ballpark isn't the most popular article on the site with Washington Park in the title, so it makes sense to move disambig page there. Will leave the naming of the individual ballpark articles to those most familiar with that area. --MattWright (talk) 06:17, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Oppose use of a tool which asserts its own beta-test status for these purposes; that's worse than google. The actual statistics are 997 for Washington Park, to 1149 for Washington Park, Chicago (neighborhood); if such a self-referential metric is to be used at all (which I doubt), the proper treatment would be to dab both, probably as Washington Park, Chicago and Washington Park, Brooklyn. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 23:03, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak oppose. The article traffic tool has produced some ludicrous move proposals, and so its "evidence" should be disregarded. Andrewa (talk) 23:29, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Oppose, for now. Using wikipedia page views to determine primary topic is problematically solipsistic. At the very least there needs to be a wider discussion about the appropriateness of using the tool for that purpose. olderwiser 19:05, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Discussion[edit]

Any additional comments:--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 15:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.