Talk:Wayland Academy, Wisconsin

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wisconsin Low‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Photos[edit]

The page badly needs campus photos, especially of Wayland Hall. Does anybody have some? www.wayland.org is copyrighted, so no taking. Njc3288 07:05, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I had a few minutes when I was in Beaver Dam, so I took a bunch of pictures. Royal broil 05:29, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tags added in January 2010[edit]

I am responding to tags added by 68.190.118.182. That editor added template:Advert template:Refimprove, and template:Cleanup-rewrite. I do not see any reason for the advertisement tag. While the is no criticism on the page, its tone strikes me at first glance as encyclopedic. I do agree that more references could be added, and I hope to work with other editors to add them. as far as "refimprove", which states "This article may need to be rewritten entirely to comply with Wikipedia's quality standards," this sounds silly to me. My largest concern would be with the number of unsourced, redlinked alumni at the end of the article. Cheers,--Baron Larf 07:53, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with everything that BaronLarf said - I brought up the issue about the article being well-written. The article does need inline citations, however. Royal broil 13:17, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]