Talk:Williams Murray Hamm
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 27 May 2010. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Requested move[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Move. Non-admin close as this is uncontroversial move and could have been done without RfM. — Hellknowz ▎talk 22:32, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Williams murray hamm → Williams Murray Hamm — Title should be in capitals as name. Williamsmurrayhamm (talk) 11:01, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
We don't do advertising ![edit]
I have returned the page to a version before the promotional, advertorial fluff piece it suddenly became today. Wholesale changes such as those should be reliably sourced and encyclopaedically written. We don't do advertising, or marketing fluff -Roxy the dog (resonate) 11:16, 26 June 2014 (UTC)