This is the talk page for discussing changes to the Zamanfou article itself.Please do not use this page to discuss about the cultural phenomenon itself. Wikipedia is not a forum.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
I read this article, and still don't know what Zamanfou means. I think the article needs some improvement (or I am a malakas)
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.74.89.62 (talk) 22:19, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I recall that there were sources from works of Nikos Dimou in this article. Why have they been removed? Is it because a person like Nikos Dimou isn't considered a verifiable source by the guidelines of Wikipedia, or is it because most Greek people hate him because of his works? I'm certain that all people who yell against this article are also haters of Nikos Dimou, but is there any serious reason why sources have been removed? Thank you... 85.74.119.191 15:02, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The humorous, unencyclopaedic style of writing in Wikipedia is not acceptable. The article has been rewritten in an encyclopaedic style, removing inappropriate humor. This resulted in the removal of sections that do not meet the notability standards of Wikipedia as well as sections that are purely intended as humorous. Please refer to the aformentioned guidelines for more information. There is no "hate" or any other type of discrimination against editors, only the credibility of a source. Sources cited as references of purely humorous, uninformative, unencyclopaedic content will be removed along with the content. If you think I'm mistaken, be bold and undo my edits, re-adding the sources where appropriate. However, please make sure the content added adheres to Wikipedia's style guidelines. Thank you --dionyziz (talk) 11:14, 18 February 2008 (UTC).[reply]
