Template:Did you know nominations/Adentro

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk | contribs) at 09:31, 4 May 2021 (Fixed obsolete html tag Lint errors). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 11:29, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Adentro[edit]

Created/expanded by Hahc21 (talk). Self nom at 05:25, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

  • QPQ done. New enough and long enough at time of nomination: 5x now, expansion began 31 edits ago on June 9, 2012. Article is neutral enough. No plagiarism concerns. Hook is properly formatted. Image has fair use rational. Hook is interesting. this supports menstruation in hooked text.
  • Fact tag needs cleaning. linkcheck is giving problems with this and I'm having problems too. Text says "tenth studio album". When I check source, it doesn't say what album this was and when I manually count, I get 14th and can't tell which ones aren't studio albums from the list. Not sure source is supporting that. --LauraHale (talk)


Explain problematic link. (Down for just me?) Explain sourcing for first half of hooked text to know where ten came from. --LauraHale (talk) 21:05, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

What happens is that latin sources counts compilations as studio albums, that's why they say 14 instead of 10. if you look at the Billboard article, "Arjona Tries New Approach For 10th Album", which is ref No.2, you'll see. Regards. —Hahc21 22:12, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
I've fixed the {{fact}} templates. I think the problematic link is dead or something. I'll check it again. —Hahc21 22:15, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
The link is dead. Google chatched it: [1] But i think a replacement would be hard to find. I should've archived it. —Hahc21 22:17, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Can you improve the citation for the sentence as it relates to the hooked text? And fix the one now broken citation? --LauraHale (talk) 00:36, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
I can improve the cit. for the sentence, but i don't know if I could fined a replacement for the dead link. I prefer to remove it until i'm able to. —Hahc21 01:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
I'm nominally okay with the dead link. I'd prefer a live one... but removing the fact is okay. If you can improve the source for the 10 thing, I'm good to go. --LauraHale (talk) 01:07, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Hey i have a problem. I've read the source you picked up and i don't find where it says 14. Could you please help me? —Hahc21 01:30, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Oh, i re-read your comment and undesrtood. That page shows all releases by Arjona, including compilations. I've changed its first apparition, but I don't find a replacement for the second. Another source to cover the 100,000 people concert in VZLA has been difficult to find for me. —Hahc21 01:47, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
The source supporting the 10 number is this:
  • Cobo, Leila (10 December 2005). "Arjona Tries New Approach For 10th Album". Billboard. Nielsen Business Media. p. 42. Retrieved 5 June 2012.

It is ref No.2 on the list of references of the article. —Hahc21 01:55, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Article currentl says: "to promote his tenth studio album, Adentro. The tour resumed on 2007 for a second leg, in which he visited more countries. Approximately, two million people attended his concerts throughout his world tour.[14] " The source needs to be added to the article in the relevant place. Here is not good enough. Please add this information to the article so I can pass your DYK as the in article citation is not good enough. :) --LauraHale (talk) 02:32, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
0.0 Thanks! I didn't saw that. I'll add it. —Hahc21 03:12, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Ok, done. I've properly cited the hooked text, i think. Is it ready now? :) —Hahc21 03:14, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Good to go! :D --LauraHale (talk) 04:04, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

:D Thanks! My 3rd DYK Hahc21 04:13, 25 June 2012 (UTC)