Template talk:Double-dagger

Template:Double-dagger is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.

Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases.

Typography Template‑class

	This template is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography articles
Template	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Discussion regarding image use[edit]

There is a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Templates#Images in templates regarding how to handle templates that were created to insert images of typographic characters. These characters are now available via Unicode. Please comment there if interested, Rjjiii (talk) 16:04, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 14 June 2023[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change the current template to the sandbox version. See this thread for details: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Templates#Images_in_templates Rjjiii (talk) 08:36, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Per rationale in other tper. Izno (talk) 19:57, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 29 June 2023[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change to the sandbox version. As of 2023, there are no longer issues with major screen readers saying these symbols. There is minimal difference between using the character alone and the character with abbr tags. The tooltip provided by abbr could encourage editors to misplace notes within the character. Rjjiii (talk) 03:03, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Izno (talk) 08:04, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]