Template talk:Air Force Space Command

This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles

Aviation

This template is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States

This template is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Active vs Inactive

Air Force Space Command has a bit of history behind it; being started in 1982, and not folding at the end of the Cold War, it has held its fair share of units. I propose editing the template to BOLD the designations of Active units, while still listing the defunct/deactivated units on the template. Any comments? TDRSS (talk) 17:11, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe using bold would be better. I just now put (inactive) after the 3 SCS and added 850 SCS. Bold for active probably makes better use of the space. --Pmsyyz (talk) 23:33, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is a need to add some kind of a legend to explain this. I had it halfway reverted before I checked this talk page. — MrDolomite • Talk 15:10, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]