User:Titodutta/CVU/Students/Som999
Starting our talk. --Tito Dutta (talk) 07:21, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Introductory questions[edit]
- Tell me something about your opinion on vandalism. --Tito Dutta (talk) 07:21, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
- -To me, Vandalism means
- Addition of some undesirable content to an article.
- Deletion of some vital information or change some information from the article suc that article might loose its importance.
- Blanking content of an article with some irrelevent content.
- Deleting or blanking any referenced content without citing any reference or reason.
Som999 (talk) 07:31, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
- Which tools you use to revert vandalism? --Tito Dutta (talk) 07:21, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Study[edit]
- Read these two articles Vandalism and Wikipedia:Vandalism!
- Read this essay: Wikipedia:Assume good faith!
Take time, you don't need to hurry! --Tito Dutta (talk) 07:33, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
- -Read the above mentioned articles and essay. Got the key idea behind vandalism and good faith. -Som999 (talk) 14:53, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
- Please read WP:NOTVAND and WP:AGF --Tito Dutta (talk) 15:33, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Questions set 01[edit]
1. Define Vandalism in your words! 2. What is the difference between good faith edit and vandalism? --Tito Dutta (talk) 07:36, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Answers[edit]
1.Vandalism
- Vandalism, in terms of wikipedia is to changed the content of wikipedia in a way that might hurt the integrity of Wikipedia. Adding some contents that is irrelevent into a specific article or deleting some integral content of an article that might affect the motive of the article or changing some content of an article that might affect the impotance of article is termed as Vandalism.
- Some action that is considered as vandalism are:
- Blanking the content of an article
- Removing or adding non content tags unnecessarily
- Writing offensive edit summary, adding copyrighted material after warning
- Malicious page or account creation
2.Difference between good faith edit and vandalism
- Good Faith edit is considering that an edit has been made on an article for constructive purpose. Although initially it might look that the changes made might affect an article, but some times for specific purpose or need that changes may be essencial for the article. There exists potential difference between Good faith edit and Vandalism. In vandalism, the sole purpose is to affect wikipedia article in destructive way or not to adhere the wikipedia guidelines. Some actions like Boldly editing, changing an article content without leaving an edit summary,violating copyright unknowningly,accidental or experimental changes made by new editors or incorrect wiki style should be considered as good faith edit. -Som999 (talk) 16:08, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- Question: Collect 5 examples of Good faith revert and vandalism each! --Tito Dutta (talk) 07:56, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
- Answers
Examples of Vandalism:
- Blanking an article entirely
- Adding some non sence or objectional content into an article
- Uploading copyrighted material after warnings.
- Removing non content tags e.g
{{afd}}from an article - Creating mutiple account with malicious motive
Examples of Good Faith Edit
- Editing an article without adding an edit summary
- Experimental or accidental changes made by newcomers
- Violating copyright or wikipedia guidelines unknowingly
- Adding original research or personal attacks on some one
- Spelling mistakes that might look ugly or inappropriate for the article --Som999 (talk) 11:51, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
I meant "diffs' of edits which you have reverted and marked as "good faith" or "vandalism" --Tito Dutta (talk) 14:12, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Regret for discontinuation from the course[edit]
With due respect i would like to inform you that due to my professional workload and different exams i am unable to continue this course right now. I regret although with a good start and good guidance from you i am unable to finish the course due to my own reason. I hope later on some time we will finish this course. Som999 (talk) 16:43, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Ya sure, inform me when you are back! --Tito Dutta (contact) 17:08, 16 May 2013 (UTC)