User talk:E0steven

==[[

Rollback

I've granted the right. Kanonkas was right to give pause, but the quality of your reverts counts for more than your tenure here. Remember to review WP:RBK please or ask me for any help. Pedro :  Chat  20:03, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

== I have replaced the editedits is causing me frustration. I urged you to not remove the factual information without entering into a discussion as to what about the facts you found objectionable. You failed to do this. Please explain why before removing the comments again or I will complain about you. --216.17.75.89 (talk) 18:22, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

I've reviewed your edit and undid my own reversion. I agree your first edits were not of the quality / NPOV required. You should see your new version as-is. However, I would still like some-sort of verification to your statements. When/where did he state that he should be attacked on sight? Could be gossip/rumor without any backing. Thanks e0steven(☎Talk|✍Contrib) 18:24, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you very much! Here is a source. I do not know how to source it. It is straight from the lyrics. http://www.sing365.com/music/lyric.nsf/Quitter-lyrics-Eminem/BA4A2B0CA28A9B0448256A7900023080 --216.17.75.89 (talk) 18:25, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

"So this is what we ask of our fans

If you ever see Everlast, WHOOP HIS ASS Hit him with sticks, bricks, rocks, throw shit at him Kick him, spit on him, treat him like a hoe, bitch-slap him Do it for me, do it for Fred, do it for Limp Do it for Rock, do it for rap, do it for Kid Do it for Ice-T, do it just to do it, fuck it He's a bitch, he ain't gon' hit you back, he's nothin! Shit in five years we'll all be "Eating at Whitey's" And he'll be bussin tables in that bitch, cleanin the toilets" --216.17.75.89 (talk) 18:26, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Not a problem. I saw your previous edit and reverted before checking to make sure it was a 'cleaned' up version. Please continue to make positive contributions to Wikipedia. I suggest you head over to The Sandbox where testing and tutorials can help you become a better editor! Also it is easy and quick to make your own account on Wikipedia, have a name instead of a number :) e0steven(☎Talk|✍Contrib) 18:29, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Skyskyskyskyskysky

hey. that was quick. I am conducting a four day experiment for a sociology class where I add irrelevant information and see what happens (it would have been taken out at the end anyway) but can I ask how you caught that so fast and how you knew it was wrong? Replied to here e0steven(☎Talk|✍Contrib) 20:39, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Banmetoo regarding vandalism of Daniel's page

It said vandal-proof, so I took it as a challenge. Immature I know. It seemed a win-win situation - either I'd have managed to beat the vandal-proof-ness or the edit would have been removed, as it was. So the question is, how did you do that so quickly? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Banmetoo (talk • contribs) 14:32, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

You shouldn't really take any vandal-proof listing as a challenge, however there are several tools for reverting vandalism quickly and efficiently. Hopefully you'll apply yourself to reverting vandalism instead of creating it! Tools like Huggle and Twinkle help with this process. e0steven(☎Talk|✍Contrib) 14:37, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Cool. I'll try —Preceding unsigned comment added by Banmetoo (talk • contribs) 14:41, 28 February 2009 (UTC)