User talk:エグチキチー
May 2024[edit]
Hello, I'm NoobThreePointOh. I noticed that you recently removed content from Filet-O-Fish without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 12:43, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Ronald McDonald House Charities, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 12:44, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Lucky Pierrot, you may be blocked from editing. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 12:44, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. —Smalljim 12:45, 6 May 2024 (UTC)エグチキチー (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
英語で話してください。こちらは英語版ウィキペディアです。(Google Translated: please speak in English. This is the English Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 13:01, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- In case any administrator is wondering, I loosely translated this into "If you tried to improve the content of the page, it would be considered vandalism and you would be blocked" from Google Translate. I'm not sure if this is really what they're saying, but uh... Google Translate isn't always wrong. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 12:51, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Whoops. Without the period, it translates into "When I tried to improve the page content, it was considered vandalism and I was blocked." My fault on that part. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 12:53, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- (ec) ChatGPT offers: "It is unfair that I was blocked and considered a vandal when I tried to improve the page content." —Smalljim 12:55, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Smalljim I forgot to mention that this user is actually globally locked; they've been blocked on de.wiki for "nonsensical edits" (I think). NoobThreePointOh (talk) 12:58, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- (ec) ChatGPT offers: "It is unfair that I was blocked and considered a vandal when I tried to improve the page content." —Smalljim 12:55, 6 May 2024 (UTC)