User talk:81.108.136.100

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello 81.108.136.100!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (81.108.136.100) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started.

Happy editing! - wolf 03:44, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help
This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.


Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a minimum number of days and made a minimum number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (81.108.136.100) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! creffett (talk) 18:56, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020[edit]

You removed content from the body of Epsom College because it appears in an infobox nearby. I understand this seems to be a reasonable thing to do but it conflicts with the purpose of the infobox. "When considering any aspect of infobox design, keep in mind the purpose of an infobox: to summarize (and not supplant) key facts that appear in the article (an article should remain complete with its summary infobox ignored). " See MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE. I've reverted your edit. Gab4gab (talk) 18:55, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for 3 months[edit]

Checkuser Block - Bbb23 17:07, 30 January 2020 (UTC) (Non-administrator comment) - wolf 04:13, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are you J-Man11?[edit]

Yes or no?

BlueD954 (talk) 09:31, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Waddie96. I noticed that in this edit to The Liberty Bell (march), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. comrade waddie96 (talk) 14:01, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to 1st Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Brigade, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:34, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
It would appear that you can not or will not read the edit summary. 81.108.136.100 (talk) 19:52, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Learn to cite your sources and use official news[edit]

Learn to cite your sources and use official news

BlueD954 (talk) 11:48, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No thanks, I'm happy for you to do the boring clerical stuff, you seem you enjoy it and it gives you an intellectual challenge I'm sure. 81.108.136.100 (talk) 19:51, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I mam no you cleaner-up. It is not 'oring clerical stuff' This is Wikipedia not your personal interests. Buckshot06 Dormskirk I'm sure you'll agree.BlueD954 (talk) 08:02, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Mr. 81.108.136.100, I understand that you may be adding material, of very high provenance, almost directly from official sources, but this is an encyclopedic project, where part of our rules stipulate that everything must have a WP:VERIFIABLE source. You - that's YOU - have to do the 'boring clerical stuff,' adding reliable references, or you will probably face administrator action and have to leave the site. That's the way our rules work. I'm sorry if my bluntness offends, but those are the rules here. Kind regards, Buckshot06 (talk) 11:17, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Firepower – The Royal Artillery Museum into Royal Artillery Museum. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 21:23, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your revert[edit]

Has no reference and has no relevance to the article. So don't lecture!

BlueD954 (talk) 00:08, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Blocked for 6 months[edit]

Checkuser Block - NinjaRobotPirate 06:08, 7 September 2020 (UTC) (Non-administrator comment) - wolf 04:13, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]