User talk:83.87.67.120

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Argumentation theory. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 14:19, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Disambiguation pages

Please note that disambiguation pages like Responsibility are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

• Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
• Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
• Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
• Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
• Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
• Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

If you are interested in writing an article on causal moral accountability, please read wp:Your first article. Leschnei (talk) 12:50, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

Hello, I'm Sea Cow. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Natural rights and legal rights, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sea Cow (talk) 01:08, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)

It appears that you copied or moved text from Lysander Spooner to Natural rights and legal rights. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. DanCherek (talk) 23:10, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Economic interventionism, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 00:42, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Economic totalitarianism

I've restored the redirect- while this is plausibly notable it is an entirely unsourced article violates Wikipedia's policies of verifiability (WP:V) and no original research (WP:NOR), the majority of the content is a block quote, and it is essay like. Many thanks, please let me know if you have questions, if you want to convert it to an article again please cite sources. VickKiang (talk) 01:52, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Your changes to Compulsory cartel

Dear Anonymous 83.87.67.120.

Under „Types of compulsory cartels“ you have added interesting examples of economic regulation and other Wikipedia subjects. Your text is valuable, but you should rather put it to other places.

Why does your text not fit to Compulsory cartel? – First of all: Not just anyone is able to become member of a cartel. For this, he/she should have a factory or mine in a market with restricted entry. Second: A cartel is a social group. Cartel members usually know each other. Potentially, they communicate with each other. – In your examples of regulation and economic control, these features are missing. You describe anonymous markets with free access nevertheless highly regulated.

I would therefore recommend that you take your text back from the ‘… cartel’ entry and move it to more appropriate places. L-scriptor (talk) 08:29, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Free market democracy, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 14:34, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

---