User talk:Afterlifeperfection

August 2012[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Syrthiss (talk) 16:45, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Afterlifeperfection (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wikipedia is a large contributor to the design of the virtual environment. Spamming to this environment is like throwing thrash to the ground without considerations to the ecosystem, and clearly this is not my intention. I also note that it is good to have guardians against such pollution in the virtual environment, but in the case of adding relevant links similar to gutenberg.org and archive.org adds to the architecture a region of further literary studies over a subject matter or a person. The site in question is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License, and the links directed to that site are added only if there are no other the same works already linking at wikipedia. And thus, I see no act of polluting the internet by this act and follow the guidelines. And by leaving out "at this.domain" section from the link, there should not be any visual conditioning of the user of wikipedia, unlike CCEL, gutenberg and archive.org have, thus leaving out the psychological advertising pollution from the users experience. The larger the wikipedia gets, the harder it is to contribute, as the general topics narrow in amount... Afterlifeperfection (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You say spamming for another website was clearly not your intention but your actions suggest exactly the opposite.You seem to be arguing that your spam links are superior to those left by other spammers. Maybe they are, but Wikipedia prefers not to be spammed at all. Now that it has been made clear to you that this is not considered acceptable here, you should post a new request explaining what types of edits you would make if unblocked. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:21, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I understand that you want to hold the line here. For me, literature is the etymology of the modern thought, which influences to the very neurogenesis of the post-innate nature. Works that have significantly influenced to the asymmetric shapes of contemporary ideas are the fundamental sources for understanding the very core of what makes the humanity as it is now. I won't add links to libraries that represent these sources, because you have to keep a strong line that prevents the decline of valuable content in the hands of spammers and advertisers who seek only their own benefit. And you need to be cynical about people who post links to external sites. You do not know them. You do not know their intentions. You do not know what end they serve. And I don't need my account to be unblocked. On side of my bibliophilia, I have my hands full on working with experimental neuropsychology over the formation of sub-modular brain areas, but thank you for the offer. You should encourage students to work on the wikipedia, them having in mind that this site is used as a reference site for the uneducated. Afterlifeperfection (talk) 23:36, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]