User talk:Beeblebrox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
please stay in the top three tiers

Orphaned non-free image File:Richard Ivey School of Business logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Richard Ivey School of Business logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:56, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Howzitgoing?[edit]

Here is a message that's not from a Kumioko sock. How you doing, Beeblebrox? Have y'all had daylight yet? Take it easy, and thanks for sucking it up for the rest of us. Drmies (talk) 00:43, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Hehe. Actually we are at just over 19 hours of daylight right now. Doing good, just spent a week out in the woods and floating around on lakes. After fifteen years here I finally saw a Kenai Peninsula wolf in the wild that was extremely cool. Although it was probably wandering around by itself because the Funny River Fire, which burned an area larger than the city of Chicago, displaced it. And thanks to my awesome talk page stalkers I haven't actually read a single word of the sock nonsense going on here. So overall doing good, although I am currently in the middle of drafting my first ArbCom decision and it is a pain. Not that anyone said being an arb would be easy... Beeblebrox (talk) 17:54, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

American politics Proposed decision[edit]

I would post this on the page, but this is more a personnel matter. I am going to be very busy until the weekend. I was wondering if there would be any findings and remedies that directly deal with me? I just want to know, so I can try to respond.Casprings (talk) 22:36, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

The draft is almost done, and right now there is not anything specifically pertaining to you, but I can't say for a certainty until my co-drafter finishes up their part of it. So I guess "probably not" is the best answer I can give. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:33, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
So I am apparently the lone offender? Seriously biased I have to say. Arzel (talk) 18:13, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
I prefer to discuss arbitration business on the case talk pages, but I note the irony that you have demonstrated the very behavior you are being sanctioned for in this comment. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:17, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
What behaviour? You wrote the proposal and the origianl request was from an RfC which I have not broken. Casprings submitted because I was not blocked because of that RfC and the Arbitration was accepted to cover general issues. You made it very specific to me. Can you honestly say that I have done anything since that RfC which would cause your proposal? Arzel (talk) 18:23, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Again, I would prefer to have this discussion at the actual arbitration case pages, and in fact we have both already commented there so I don't see any need to have a secondary discussion here. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:31, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

DS request based on pending American politics case[edit]

I have a question here about the status of discretionary sanctions and the scope of the American politics case. Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 21:19, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Replied there. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:59, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your prompt reply. Out of curiosity, do you know if DS have ever been used to apply to an open case? Just wondering... Viriditas (talk) 06:12, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Rollback#User:Rovine[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Rollback#User:Rovine. Thanks. Rovinemessage 20:58, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Mail-message-new.svg
Hello, Beeblebrox. Please check your email – you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

Confession0791 talk 00:38, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Eloquence's user rights[edit]

Eloquence has [global] staff user rights, which includes "Edit all user rights (userrights)". As the VP Engineering, he also has root access and could remove userrights from that point. You'll have to go to Meta to look at the group, it's not accessible on this project. Risker (talk) 02:18, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

I figured it must be something like that. Thanks. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:07, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Beeblebrox. You have new messages at Rijinatwiki's talk page.
Message added 04:24, 17 July 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Rijin (talk) 04:24, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Request for feedback on ADN/AK Dispatch News article[edit]

Hi there,

I wrestled with the newly titled Alaska Dispatch News article (redirect from the ADN article). Could you take a look at the "Controversy" section and see if a better solution to a Wikipedia sourcing problem than that which I have used might replace mine? Before my edits, the section bordered on unreadable. I sent this same note to Radio KAOS. Activist (talk) 20:44, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom keeps me pretty busy these days but I'll try to find some time to have a look at it. Beeblebrox (talk) 15:29, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Delete request[edit]

This article was created by a user you blocked two years ago for disruptive editing. While, strictly speaking, it is not inaccurate, the article was pretty clearly written with political intent and should be deleted as such (I have explained further on the talk page). Thank you.--68.61.5.58 (talk) 02:45, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) I tagged it A7, I hope I'm correct (not that proficient with CSD's as of yet) Mlpearc (open channel) 03:02, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
It's actually a G10 (negative unsourced BLP) because there's not a single reference on that page. Deleted. Risker (talk) 04:12, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Thank you, I thought of that but, I was thinking a single person. Mlpearc (open channel) 04:26, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Looks like my work here is done... Beeblebrox (talk) 15:30, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Precious again[edit]

Cornflower blue Yogo sapphire.jpg

"move along"
Thank you, vandal fighter in open resistance, for welcoming and deleting, for clear language and reflection, for closing, quote: "clarified, move along", - you are an awesome Wikipedian (15 April 2010)!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:54, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

A year ago, you were the 553rd recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:27, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

None of the Above (Serbia)[edit]

Hi. Back in November, you speedied None of the Above (Serbia) as G10. Since I can't see the article, could you please re-check if it wasn't just a vandalized page, and if there's something salvageable in its history? Or the article was just a negative slant about them? I ask because they're a relatively notable, parliamentary party, so I'd expect that article to have been created by someone in the know. Regards, No such user (talk) 07:27, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

It was created as basically several sentences consisting of the creating user's opinion of their activities, which were pretty negative, and no sources. The only other edits related to what criterion might be used to speedy delete it. This user was creating many articles on minor Serbian political parties, all of which seem to have been deleted. I think it would be easier to start from scratch. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:18, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

hey[edit]

(thread moved from top of page Beeblebrox (talk) 17:07, 28 July 2014 (UTC))


The edit i made to fireblazer isn't vandalism because he's actually my friend . You can confirm this with him. Thank you. P.S. Please reconsider your decision . If I do anything wrong, you can take my rights away. Matheweditking (talk) 17:02, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Being your friend doesn't make it ok to create a page with nonsense on it. Another user came along and cleaned up the mess you made, so you wasted that user's time with your nonsense. And you just flat out do not have enough experience, despite your grandiose claims, to be granted any advanced permissions at this time. Also, you don't appear to even know how to use a talk page properly, and effective communication is a vital part of vandal fighting. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:06, 28 July 2014 (UTC)