User talk:Amrutha Radhakrishnan

Speedy deletion nomination of Teleprinter's problem

Hello Amrutha Radhakrishnan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Teleprinter's problem for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Joel.Miles925 (talk) 13:53, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sasthamangalam has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sasthamangalam was changed by Amrutha Radhakrishnan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.856289 on 2016-03-30T14:04:40+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:04, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Teleprinter's problem

The article Teleprinter's problem has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Un-encyclopedic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —teb728 t c 00:55, 31 March 2016 (UTC)