User talk:Anaxial

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Please comment on Talk:2014 Ebola virus cases in the United States[edit]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:2014 Ebola virus cases in the United States. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Tq[edit]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Tq. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

GOCE October 2014 newsletter[edit]

Guild of Copy Editors October 2014 newsletter is now ready for review. Highlights:

– Your project coordinators: Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978 and Miniapolis.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Canidae[edit]

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:45, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa[edit]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Reliable sourcing[edit]

Thanks for your input. It is common knowledge that the name 'Didelphis' derives from the forked glans. Why not require a reliable source for 1 + 1 = 2? Where do you people draw the line?? 73.49.1.133 (talk) 18:48, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

The problem is that there's a sourced statement already in the article saying that the name derives instead from the double womb of the female, and claiming that "delphys" in fact means "womb", not "penis". If you have a source contradicting that, by all means provide it, and it can be discussed on the Talk page so that we can determine which source is the more reliable. Anaxial (talk) 19:17, 22 October 2014 (UTC)