User talk:Arthur Cutz

Tag removal

Hello. Why did you remove this tag? --Dweller (talk) 13:13, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Hello, it was not tagged correctly (dead) so I tidied it up. Arthur Cutz (talk) 14:47, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: Jericho and RVD

I think you misinterpreted my edits. Per WP:LEAD, the lead is supposed to be a summary of their overall career. Keywords = "a summary". Certainly, Jericho's music and film career should be mentioned in his lead, and RVD-TV should be mentioned in RVD's lead. They are important aspects in these mens' careers. However, Bloodstained Memoirs is far from a "major movie". What has being in the movie (which hasn't even been released yet, by the way) added to his overall career? Has he changed because of it? Has he received third party media attention because of it? That's the sort of info that belongs in a lead. At best, being in the documentary deserves a one sentence mention in a "other media" section. Nikki311 23:53, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:911ct supporters

Template:911ct supporters has been nominated for deletion by Ice Cold Beer. As this TfD nomination includes objections to the same list of people that is currently in use in Template:911ct, I am inviting you to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. (I am sending this message to you as a current or former editor of Charlie Sheen, following the guideline on multiple messages.) Regards —  Cs32en  09:30, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

September 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Darrenhusted (talk) 19:58, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

You need to discuss it and stop calling out for "further action". I suggest the talkpage. Darrenhusted (talk) 19:59, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

September 2009

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abusing multiple accounts to edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. ~ mazca ^talk 20:48, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Molly small.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Molly small.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. McJEFF ^(talk) 00:23, 12 October 2009 (UTC)