User talk:Aubmn

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Aubmn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Thomas.W ^{talk to me} 20:57, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there![edit]

The sources on those pages are bad,they are outdated.Sources in our article are newer.

As for the Naval Aviation,I looked there too,and same thing as here:outdated sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RussianBear158 (talk • contribs) 16:25, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of currently active Russian military aircraft[edit]

Yeah,thank you for your trust.

I was in a real hurry,couldn`t go to the talk page,but next time I`ll try to do it.

One tip:the source behind the number MUST be changed with the number.If you change the number without the source,and the source gives another number,than that is bad :( .

RussianBear158 (talk) 18:08, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm ScrapIronIV. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of currently active Russian military aircraft, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Scr★pIron^IV 17:39, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Marie Antoinette may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

guardians were opened to corruption and a line of communication was kept with the outer world . <ref((Harvnb l Rupert Furneaus l The last days of Marie Antoinette l 1971 l p 120-130

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:17, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI: Marie Antoinette article again[edit]

Even though you would know this per the WP:Ping at WP:ANI, I'm letting you know with this post, per protocol, that I have reported you there. Flyer22 (talk) 01:26, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To your attention[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding you. --Blue Indigo (talk) 12:36, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Blue Indigo (talk · contribs). Since Aubmn is already aware of the discussion, there is no need to alert him to it again. Flyer22 (talk) 01:25, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Flyer22: My apologies, I had misunderstood something in the heading & thought the person mentioned (during the discussion) had to be noticed... --Blue Indigo (talk) 16:09, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:32, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI again[edit]

I reported you at WP:ANI again: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Aubmn again... What to do?. A WP:Permalink for it is here. Since you are currently blocked for a month, feel free to respond to the thread here at your talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 21:24, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusive sockpuppetry per consensus here. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 18:36, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]