User talk:Audriusa/Archive3

Fair use rationale for File:DariusirGirenas1.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:DariusirGirenas1.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:00, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Gentleman scientist[edit]

Hi Audriusa, I saw that you blanked our discussion on the above talk page. If you don't mind I would like to restore it as the talk pages are not just for resolving current issues, but also meant as an archive of past activity. This ensures transparency of the editing process and makes it easier to resolve issues should they arise again in the future. Discussions should therefore not be deleted upon completion. Let me know what you think. Cheers, Rainbowwrasse (talk) 16:04, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See my talk page for discussion. Rainbowwrasse (talk) 22:00, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

After your most recent edit and 'disclosure' on my talk page you might want to blank that discussion as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rainbowwrasse (talk • contribs) 13:04, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes of course. Audriusa (talk) 13:28, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

|;-)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rainbowwrasse (talk • contribs) 13:30, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, you were actually being serious...(!) Also, you missed a spot... Rainbowwrasse (talk) 14:09, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Touch typing[edit]

A tag has been placed on Touch typing, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This article needs other citations and external links for verification.Moreover,everyone using a computer will know about this,and therefore,this article is useless,and should be deleted.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Aviation accidents and incidents caused by intentional disregard for a standard operating procedure by pilot[edit]

Category:Aviation accidents and incidents caused by intentional disregard for a standard operating procedure by pilot, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:58, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of JAMWiki[edit]

The article JAMWiki has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The articles gives no references to reliable sources, thus notability is not established. If such sources exist for this article, please remember to remove this template after adding them.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 09:48, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]