User talk:Benyon24

Copyright problems[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Graham gallery, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.grahamgallery.org.uk/about_us.html. As a copyright violation, Graham gallery appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Graham gallery has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Graham gallery and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Graham gallery with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Graham gallery.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:22, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008[edit]

The recent edit you made to Graham gallery constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content. Thank you. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 15:24, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008[edit]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Graham gallery. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 15:27, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Graham gallery[edit]

A tag has been placed on Graham gallery requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 16:46, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Geoff beckett squadron hacks.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Geoff beckett squadron hacks.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 04:24, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Geoff beckett baders bad show.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Geoff beckett baders bad show.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 04:28, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Geoff beckett ladies race.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Geoff beckett ladies race.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 04:29, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Geoff Beckett[edit]

The article Geoff Beckett has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP. You tried to source the article, but provided no reliable sources (see my edit comments on deleted sources). No showing of notability. Written like an ad.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also, please disclose any connection you have with the subject of the article or with the book he is promoting (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest). Another article that you created about the same subject was recently deleted.—Finell 07:34, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]