User talk:Bible1611man

Douglas D. Stauffer[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Douglas D. Stauffer, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.rightlydivided.com/content/about-the-author.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:46, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We appreciate your contribution, but in order to verify that you have permission to use the material we need you to follow the steps listed at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 21:07, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:10, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Douglas D. Stauffer for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Douglas D. Stauffer, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas D. Stauffer until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:14, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fourteen Rules of Translation[edit]

It would perhaps be worthwhile to list some translation rules historically used by the KJV translators, but the place and tone of the post you made in the Bibe Version Debate weren't informative and actually constituted POV. To be honest, I clicked on the edit to find out what the 14 rules were and was disappointed to not really learn what they were and whether they were stated by the KJV translaters. Could you perhaps place those rules, as stated by the translators (and cited), in a KJV article? Thanks.SkyWriter (Tim) (talk) 18:40, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]