User talk:Blondowl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposed deletion of Spooky spirits[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Spooky spirits, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Stephenb (Talk) 15:24, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Becky & Tim: Spooky Spirits[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Becky & Tim: Spooky Spirits, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Stephenb (Talk) 15:25, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Little context in Motorhead game[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Motorhead game, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Motorhead game is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Motorhead game, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 15:30, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Short articles[edit]

Hi. Your contributions are appreciated, but they don't meet the minimum standards for inclusion. For example, if ou're going to write about a video game, you need to at least give a rundown of the gameplay. Please read WP:YFA to get a better idea as to how to contribute new content. Thanks and have fun. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:36, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • You're free to contest a deletion notice, but please either give a reason or expand the article per the links provided above. Thanks. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:42, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:GripenDemo3b 25292a.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:GripenDemo3b 25292a.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:15, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:GripenDemo3b 25292a.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:GripenDemo3b 25292a.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:23, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:WiiWare-ThreeMusketeers.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:WiiWare-ThreeMusketeers.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:31, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]